Monday, March 29, 2010

CD40L and the MAB

The ALS Therapy Development Institute is a non-profit biotech fully devoted to finding a treatment for ALS. A few years ago they undertook a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on the animal model of ALS (the G93A mouse).The results implicated the costimulatory pathway which links the innate and adaptive immune systems. In an attempt to address that pathway, TDI used a monoclonal antibody against CD40L. This decreased a specific T-Cell interaction which led to the body attacking the axons of the motor neurons. A very good description of the study can be found at the Alzheimer Research Forum (Alzheimers, Parkinsons, and ALS are selective neurodegenerative diseases so research in one can provide clues into the pathways of others). This finding is interesting for a few reasons. For the first, it marks a shift in looking at ALS as a motor neuron disease to seeing it as some other dysfunction in which the neurons are injured. Second, while the treatment described isn't a "cure", it does point towards a significant pathway of disease management. Another important point is the success reported by TDI. Since the development of the murine model of ALS numerous researchers have claimed varying degrees of success in preclinical work only to have the candidate substance fail in human trials. TDI undertook an internal study to figure out why and discovered numerous variabilities for which researchers must account when designing trials. TDI's mouse program is now recognized as the "gold standard" for that model. The fact that they can report measurable and repeatable results is significant. Of course mice aren't men and this isn't a cure, but it does give quite a bit of hope that a truly effective treatment may be within reach. [UPDATE 04-02-2010: TDI discusses this via MP3 podcast.] [UPDATE 04-05-2010: The study is now available free of charge in PDF format. Very good of Nature Publishing Group to make this available to PALS and CALS!

2 comments:

  1. I'll pay you off ala Armstrong Williams if you want. I do like your comment on the forum recently about Iplex, and the new attempt to make if significant. I have reached out to Jess Rabourn of PCUT who is trying to compete with Steve Beyer for rights and access. I want to have a convo on why he thinks this is the answer.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't understand why people are into sinking so much $effort in something dubious at best. Does PCUT have _any_ idea of the investment required to produce Iplex? Insmed has already said they won't produce any more.
    IMHO Beyer should be sued for his reckless behavior. Responsible advocacy isn't that hard.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.